Animal Abandonment Laws Ontario

Recognition of our responsibility to protect animals in Ontario; The Ontario Veterinary Medical Association oversees the SafePet program. The program provides veterinary services and long- or short-term care to the pets of women and their children fleeing intimate partner violence. 5. A prescribed person who takes possession of an animal in accordance with paragraph 4 shall immediately inform an animal welfare inspector if the owner or guardian of the animal is not present and cannot be found in time. 2. Paragraph 1 shall not allow an animal welfare inspector to enter a place or part of a place used as an apartment without an arrest warrant, unless the resident of the apartment agrees to enter it. Attorney General Sylvia Jones said Thursday that the new law makes Ontario a national leader in animal welfare. The Ministry of the Solicitor General is committed to ensuring overall public safety and ensuring that Ontario communities are supported and protected by effective law enforcement, corrections, death investigations, forensic science, emergency management operations and animal welfare services, efficient and accountable. (1) For the purposes of this Act or any other Ontario animal welfare or prevention of cruelty to animals act, every inspector and officer of the Company shall exercise the powers of a police officer.

(b) promotes, supports or supports in any way the control or baiting of animals or birds; (1.2) Subsection (1) does not apply if an order applicable to the animal in accordance with ¶14 (1.1) is in force. (c) order the Corporation to pay, in whole or in part, the owner or guardian of an animal that complies with an order under subsection 13(1) of the owner`s or guardian`s fees; or Ontario has the harshest penalties in Canada for animal cruelty. The Provincial Animal Welfare Services Act covers crimes including: ABANDONMENT IN NEED – Abandonment occurs when an owner or temporary caregiver of a compromised animal (requiring care) leaves that animal in a public or private place (indoors or outdoors) without intending to return and without making arrangements for IMMEDIAT care to mitigate the animal`s state of health. (Example: Dog on public property with a broken leg attached to a bank) The mission of the Ontario SPCA is animal welfare and animal rights advocacy. Recently, the Ontario SPCA`s Law Enforcement Support Services were developed to work with and assist police in responding to animal cruelty cases. (b) puts the poison in such a position that it can be easily consumed by dogs, birds or animals which are not bovine animals and which are kept for a legitimate purpose. 3. The inspector or a representative of the undertaking which has removed or destroyed an animal in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2 shall immediately inform, if known, in writing the owner or guardian of the animal of his or her actions. The new Provincial Animal Services Welfare Act (PAWS) creates the first fully provincial animal welfare system in Canada.

It is applied by a specialized team of approximately 100 provincial inspectors, including those with specialized expertise in livestock, zoos, aquariums and horses. The new Act: 11.1 (1) Every person who owns an animal or who has the care or care of an animal shall comply with the prescribed standards of care in respect of any animal that the person owns, cares or cares for. (a) the owner or guardian of the animal has been charged with a criminal offence under this Act or any other Ontario act respecting welfare or the prevention of cruelty to animals in connection with the same act that led to the removal of the animal in accordance with subsection (1); and in Western Canada, Alberta places a high value on livestock welfare, while Saskatchewan and British Columbia offer laws closer to those of Ontario and Manitoba. Current animal cruelty legislation in Quebec does not provide for prison sentences, but the proposed changes could result in a change in the near future that would change the penalties to become more similar to those provided for in the legislation of the surrounding provinces. Current section 10 of the Act prohibits a corporation, association or group of persons from purporting to act as a corporation whose purpose is the welfare or prevention of cruelty to animals, unless it is an affiliate of the corporation. This provision is repealed and replaced by a provision prohibiting any corporation or other entity that is not the corporation or an affiliated corporation from impersonating the authority of the corporation or an affiliated corporation under the Act or from using the name “humane society”, “society for the prevention of cruelty to animals” or “spca”. or their equivalent in any language. However, a corporation or other entity that was an affiliate on April 3, 2008 may continue to use those names even if it is no longer an affiliate. HOW DO I KNOW? – When a person has accurate information as a witness to the event and has knowledge of an animal that falls within the limits of the definitions. Check with your local animal services. However, if in doubt, it is recommended that you contact the Ontario SPCA at 310-SPCA. We are available 24/7.

In March, the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which has enforced animal cruelty laws for 100 years, told the province it would no longer do so. “I am proud to say that we have delivered on our commitment to creating a modern animal welfare system,” Jones said. 5 (1) The Chief Animal Welfare Inspector may appoint in writing a person employed by a public body that is an institution within the meaning of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act or the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act as an animal welfare inspector if the person meets the prescribed requirements. 1.2. Where a justice of the peace or a provincial judge makes an order under subsection 1.1, he or she may also order that all or part of the costs incurred by the Société for the provision of food, care or treatment of the animal in accordance with its removal in accordance with paragraph 1 and in accordance with the order referred to in paragraph 1.1 be paid to the Société by the owner or guardian of the animal. Penalties for offences are a fine of up to $1,000 and 30 days` imprisonment (for non-compliance with an order of the Society or the Board of Directors, for obstructing an inspector or agent of the Society, or for knowingly reporting a false relationship to the Society in relation to an animal in distress) and a maximum fine of $60,000 and two years` imprisonment (for offences directly against an animal, in accordance with Articles 11.1 and 11(2). Sanctions may be imposed on individuals, corporations and directors and officers of corporations. In addition, a court may make an order prohibiting a person or business from owning, keeping, caring for an animal or living with an animal for a period specified in the order. Prohibition can be the rest of an individual`s life and forever for a company. The court may also order the convicted person to reimburse the company, in whole or in part, for the costs of providing food, care or treatment to an animal that is the victim of the convicted person`s offence. In the case of offences directly directed against an animal, the court may, in accordance with sections 11.1 and 11.2, make any other order it considers appropriate, including the fact that the convicted person is the subject of notice or training.

It also provides for administrative penalties for violation of the conditions of authorizations granted in accordance with Article 20 (Restricted ownership or rearing of animals) or Article 21 (Prescribed activities) or other prescribed provisions. It allows the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector to issue notifications of infringements relating to those infringements and establishes a system for the application and recovery of those penalties. 63 (1) Where an animal other than a prohibited animal is forfeited to the Crown under this Ontario Act, the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector shall take charge of the animal by the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector and have the authority to handle the animal as if the Chief Animal Welfare Inspector were the owner of the animal. 9 1. Any person who is not an animal welfare inspector may complain in writing to the Chief Animal Inspector about the conduct of an animal welfare inspector who is not the Chief Animal Inspector. Under subsection 12 (2) of applicable law, inspectors and agents of the Corporation have the right to enter a building or place without a warrant if they have observed an animal in immediate distress; This provision is amended to allow entry when an inspector or officer has reasonable grounds to believe that an animal is in immediate distress.